Pages

Showing posts with label business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label business. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Why Enterprise-Level Metro Apps Can and Will Work

I’ve written a lot about Windows 8 over the last few days as we approach the release of the Consumer Preview at the end of this month.  One subject that’s not been touched on so far is how effective new Metro apps can or could be in businesses and enterprises, and if a move to Metro might actually be a good idea for many companies.  I thought it was time to take a look at this subject in a bit more detail.

The first time I saw a Metro business app demonstrated was on a Windows 7 tablet way back in May 2011.  We didn’t know anything about Windows 8 at this point and this demo app, written and presented by Microsoft at their Tech.Days event was something new, we had no idea that it was a demo of something much bigger and in fairness the prople presenting it didn’t know either.

This app was relatively simple, a tracking app for real-estate agents out on the move.  It showed how the computer’s GPS could help locate their next appointment and it had work, task and contract management tools built right into the finger-friendly interface.  I pretty-much dismissed it at the time, as this was a Windows 7 tablet it was being demonstrated on and how could these compete, but I never forgot it.  What we didn’t know was around the corner was the deal with ARM and the promise of a new tablet-friendly OS.  But what about the rest of business?  Could Metro apps really be the way forward and how might they work?

One of the biggest pluses for businesses to move to Metro apps is that all too many companies are still using older bespoke software that runs only in either Windows XP or the much hated Internet Explorer 6.  These apps will simply have to be re-written and up until now companies have resisted.  With all support for XP ending in April 2014, which is less than 800 days from now, a critical deadline is approaching.  My argument is why redevelop these apps for Windows 7 when developing for Metro will be a better idea.  Let me explain why.

Microsoft have really pushed the boat out with the Software Development Kit (SDK) for Metro, developing it in such a way that it’s easier than ever before to write apps for the new platform.  On top of this any app compiled using the new tools will automatically run on any and all Windows 8 devices, regardless of the processor they run on.  This is an incredible achievement and is the most significant part, for me anyway, of Windows 8 overall.  This will make redevelopment of bespoke apps, and the development of new apps, much easier and cheaper.

There is also the look and feel of Metro apps to be considered.  Just because Microsoft have shown off Metro apps with minimal pull down and push up touch menus doesn’t mean that this is the way they have to be written.  A screen width of 1080 pixels is still the same resolution regardless of whether its running Metro or the Windows desktop and just as much text and information can be fitted on it.

Moreover some of the examples of Metro business apps that have appeared so far are very reminiscent of the Flash and Shockwave apps that people were designing five to seven years ago.  Back then they never took off because the plug-ins didn’t provide all the power and resources that were necessary, and could be quite hungry for processor-cycles and memory themselves.  Now though, all these resources are baked into the operating system.

The opportunity exists then for creating rich, imaginative and friendly interfaces that are, and this is the important part, designed to work with a mouse and keyboard.  Let’s not forget that what we’ve seen so far with Metro is not the only way to design a Metro app!  Software development for Windows over the years has shown us that the only limit to innovation on the desktop is the limit of the Human imagination.

Imagine then you have a book-keeping app where you can take advantage of sliding pages, even creating a ledger style and feel if you like, or a data-entry app that, rather than having people squint at small boxes and bemoan having to stare at the world’s nastiest interface all day, every day, has a user-friendly tabbed or animated interface that does the same job.  Things don’t need to be scaled up 10-times, you can design for a mouse and keyboard and everything still can be bespoke!

On top of this you then have the same apps available for people working on laptops and tablets with various hardware configurations and, with almost no problems at all, you end up with apps that can be ported to your company’s Windows Phone smartphones.

I want to finish though by answering the question about requiring to have multiple windows open on a screen at one time, each one usually a different running app.  Sharing between apps and even cloud services is baked into Windows 8 for the very first time.  Metro apps here can save you time by being designed to automatically share your data between these apps, sparing your workload.  A cleverly designed app suite in Metro could use tabs or panels to easily switch between, or display, multiple apps on your screen side by side, making everything accessible.

There is nothing to stop any of this from happening and much of it is happening already.  In short I believe that the arguments against using Metro in the business space have been clouded by the over-simplistic apps we’ve seen so far.  Nobody has yet seen the true potential of a Metro app when designed properly, these are still to come.  I believe that when they begin to appear, the world will suddenly stop and want to take another look.



Thursday, November 24, 2011

Three Quarters of EU Firms Not Ready to Recover from IT Failures

Almost three quarters of companies and public-sector organisations across nine European countries might not recover all of their data if they suffer an IT failure according to a new report released by the IT group EMC.  For the survey a total of 1,750 European companies and organisations were quizzed across the UK,  France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Benelux and Russia with each organisation ranging in size from 250 to 3000+ employees.

The research’s findings are worrying indeed.

  • 74% of organisations are not very confident that they can fully recover after a disaster, according to a new survey of 1,750 European companies
  • 54% surveyed have lost data and/or suffered systems downtime in the last year
  • 61% report hardware failure as the primary cause of data loss and downtime;  natural disasters and employee sabotage being much less likely culprits
  • 43% of organisations cite loss of employee productivity as the single biggest economic impact
  • 28% point to lost revenue as a result of a disaster
  • 40% of organisations still use tape for recovery and 80% of these organisations want to replace tape all together, highlighting the need for next generation backup and recovery

The fact that 74% of companies and organisations feel that they’re not prepared or equipped to properly recover data after an outage or disaster might be seen as very worrying for business overall.  We’ve all suffered data loss but the data losses suffered by business could affect us and them in many different ways.  They could lose customer orders, lose valuable employee details or details of current projects and so on.

The survey also details that more than half of the businesses and organisations surveyed said they had experienced data loss or systems downtime in the last year.  It’s common for companies to suffer from downtime and it’s a pity the research doesn’t go into more detail about what percentage of companies had actually experienced data loss, all we have is a corruption figure that in itself seems too high.

They say the most commonly reported causes of downtime are…

  • Hardware failure: 61%
  • Power failure: 42%
  • Data corruption: 35%

One of the problems seems to be that 40% of the companies surveyed are still replying on tape for backup.  With the falling costs of hard disks and the increased bandwidth that dedicated phone lines can bring more and more companies are moving to secure and stable off-site backup solutions and indeed many business ISPs and server hosts now offer this facility as standard.  It is clear though that not enough companies are heeding the warnings of data loss and, more important of good security.

The research found that businesses are spending, on  average, 10% of their IT budgets on backup and recovery, and 29% of businesses  do not feel they are spending enough.   For backup and disaster recovery purposes, 40% of companies still rely  on tape, with an average annual cost of €74,000 on transporting, storing,  testing and replacing tapes. Where tape is used for disaster recovery purposes,  10% still have an employee take home a copy of the backup tapes with them.

The companies surveyed included manufacturing, retail, financial services and telecoms, among others and, frankly, it is disappointing that so many companies still seem unprepared for IT and data failures when computers have now been in business for over 30 years and have been on every desk for the vast majority of that time.


© Mike Halsey (MVP) for gHacks Technology News | Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials, 2011. | Permalink |
Add to del.icio.us, digg, facebook, reddit, twitter
Post tags: ,



Monday, September 26, 2011

Google Local Business, Fix We currently do not support the location

Imagine that you have your business setup in Google under Google Places. Users from your town can search using location based queries to get your listing in the results or on Google Maps. Think Plumber Manhattan for instance. If you optimize the listing you usually have good chances to be at the top of the listing for user searches, which in turn drives great business to your website and Google Places listing.

One of the issues that businesses and webmasters who take care of the listing for businesses experience from time to time is the dreaded “We currently do not support the location”.

This basically returns a blank page with the error message instead of the businesses listing on Google Places. I actually experienced this message twice in the last three months for a client.

we currently do not support the location

It can be a serious blow to the businesses operations if it is not found on Google Places anymore. One might now assume that this message appears on purposes because something’s wrong with the listing, or maybe even the Google account in question.

This is however often not the case. The We currently do not support the location seems to be a bug in Google Places that a lot of local businesses have experienced in the last time.

I do suggest you check the email account linked to your Google Account and your Google Webmaster Tools account first to see if you got any emails or warnings from Google. The next thing that you need to do is to open your Places listing in your Google Account to check for changes or messages there.

If everything appears all right, you can try the following solution to bring your local business listing back on Maps.

The fix that worked in my client’s case both times was to make a change to the Google Places listing. The easiest way to do that is to post an update. You find the “Share an update on your place page” on the right side of the Places listing.

google places update

Just enter an update into the form and hit the Share button afterwards. Write about a new product or special offer for instance. I had to wait about 15 minutes before the local business appeared again on Google Places. The We currently do not support the location message was gone.

You can also make other changes, like adding or removing text from the site’s description, business hours or categories. Make sure you do not change the businesses location or other information related to that.

I hope this helps some local businesses who are fighting with the same bug on Google Places.


© Martin Brinkmann for gHacks Technology News | Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials, 2011. | Permalink |
Add to del.icio.us, digg, facebook, reddit, twitter
Post tags: , , , ,